Вертолет RAH 66 Comanche

Текущая версия страницы пока не проверялась опытными участниками и может значительно отличаться от версии, проверенной ; проверки требуют 22 правки.

Боинг / Сикорский RAH-66 Команч (англ. Boeing / Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche) — американский проект многоцелевого разведывательно-ударного вертолёта.

Блок: 1/9 | Кол-во символов: 301
Источник: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_/_Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

История создания

К концу десятилетия проекты на конкурс предоставили альянс фирм «Белл» и «Макдоннел-Дуглас» и объединившиеся в тандем конкуренты – фирма Сикорского и вертолётное подразделение «Боинга». В 1991 году проект союза «Боинг-Сикорский» был выбран победителем. Тогда же пока ещё несуществующему вертолёту присвоили официальное название – RAH-66 «Команч».

Вертолёт Rah-66

Новый, прежде ни одной машине не присваивавшийся, индекс показывал, что из пассивного «наблюдателя» вертолёт превратился в настоящего боевого разведчика, да ещё способного быть полноценным штурмовиком.

Сборку первого прототипа заводы начали в 1993 году, а завершилась она только весной 1995 года. Первый полёт «Команч» должен был совершить в том же году, но из-за ряда встреченных проблем с конструкцией и электроникой его отложили до 1996 года. Наконец, в январе RAH-66 впервые взлетел, проведя в воздухе 39 минут. Полёты второго прототипа стартовали в 1999 году.

Пока прототипы испытывались, армия планировала приобрести более тысячи «Команчей», а первые поставки должны были начаться в 2006 году.

Тем времени первый прототип выработал ресурс в 2002 году, налетав почти 400 часов. Второй RAH-66 пошёл на доработку для установки более мощных двигателей и дополнительного оборудования. В 2003 году начали строить третий «Команч», уже пригодный для массовой сборки, а за ним должна была последовать первая серия. Но этого не произошло.

Армия решила перенаправить бюджет на модернизацию уже существующих вертолётов и форсирование заработок разведывательных БПЛА, и программу строительства «Команчей» свернули. Оба построенных RAH-66 отправились в музей армейской авиации в Алабаме.

Блок: 2/4 | Кол-во символов: 1646
Источник: https://WarBook.club/voennaya-tehnika/vertolety/komanch/

Development

Origins and LHX

During 1982, the U.S. Army initiated the Light Helicopter Experimental (LHX) program with the aim of producing a replacement for several existing rotorcraft, including the UH-1, AH-1, OH-6, and OH-58 helicopters. It was a further six years until, in 1988, a formal request for proposal (RFP) was issued to various manufacturers, in time which the requirement had evolved into a battlefield reconnaissance helicopter. In October 1988, the Army announced two teams, these being Boeing–Sikorsky and Bell–McDonnell Douglas, received contracts to further develop their concepts. During the 1990s, it was announced that the program’s name had been changed from LHX to simply Light Helicopter (LH). In April 1991, the Army awarded the Boeing–Sikorsky team a $2.8 billion contract to complete six prototypes. Later that month the helicopter received its official designation of RAH-66 Comanche.

During November 1993, assembly of the first prototype commenced at two separate locations, these being Sikorsky’s facility in Stratford, Connecticut and Boeing’s manufacturing plant in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; later on, all of the rotorcraft’s sub-assemblies were transferred to the former location where final assembly occurred. In December 1994 the Defense Department reduced the number of planned prototypes to two as the services shifted budgets to pay for increased troop salaries. On , the first Comanche prototype was formally rolled out at Sikorsky’s production facility, after which it was transferred to West Palm Beach, Florida to commence flight testing activities. On , the prototype, flown by test pilots Bob Gradle and Rus Stiles, performed its 39-minute maiden flight. The first flight had been originally planned to take place during August 1995, but had been delayed by a number of structural and software problems that had been encountered. On , the second prototype conducted its first flight, before joining the flight test program shortly thereafter.

Prototype testing

An RAH-66 Comanche flying in formation with an AH-64 Apache. Part of the Comanche’s planned role was to designate targets for the Apache.

The flight test program was conducted using the pair of prototypes produced, which had been assigned the serial numbers 94-0327 and 95-0001. Following a demonstration of its ability to meet certain key criteria, on , it was announced that the RAH-66 had entered the $3.1 billion engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) phase of the program. Through the early 2000s, the U.S. Army maintained its plans for the intended purchase of over 1,200 Comanches, which were to fill both the scout helicopter and light attack roles; as late as 2003, it was being anticipated that deliveries of operational RAH-66s would commence as scheduled during 2006.

However, the program was not problem-free. During late 2000, it was revealed that an effort to reduce the Comanche’s empty weight by approximately 200 lb (91 kg) or 2.1 per cent in order to conform with its established target weight had been initiated. The first Comanche prototype, serial 94-0327, completed 318 flights over 387 hours before reaching the end of its testing career during January 2002. The second prototype, serial 95-0001, had accumulated 103.5 flight hours and 93 sorties by May 2001. During late 2001 and early 2002, testing with the second RAH-66 was halted while the aircraft underwent extensive modifications, received both mission equipment and more powerful T800-LHT-801 engines. On , the second prototype re-commenced flight testing with the additional equipment fitted. Accordingly, the expanded test programme involved new aspects such as the testing of the armaments and night vision systems; these test flights continued into 2003. During testing, the Comanche was recorded as having attained a cruise speed of 162 knots (186 mph; 300 km/h), as well as having achieved a «dash speed» of 172 knots (198 mph; 319 km/h); perhaps one of its more atypical capabilities was the demonstrated ability to perform a 180° turn in under five seconds.

During 2002, the Comanche program underwent heavy restructuring; consequently, the number of Comanches that were intended to be purchased was dropped down to 650 rotorcraft. At the time, the projected total cost for the full production of the Comanche in such numbers stood at $26.9 billion. Originally, the EMD phase had been planned to last for six years, as well as having involved a total of five Comanches being constructed to participate in the testing regime. During 2003, production on the third RAH-66, which was intended to be the first EMD-conformant helicopter, was started. Subsequently, eight RAH-66s were to be constructed for operational testing purposes. As planned, the initial production RAH-66s were to be completed to a Block I configuration, which would have included the majority of the rotorcraft’s planned weapons and sensors. From the 16th Comanche onwards, deliveries would have been made to the Block II standard, which was to have all of the planned capabilities included.

Cancellation

On , the U.S. Army announced that they had decided to terminate all work on the Comanche program. At the time, it was stated that the Army had determined that a number of upgrades would be necessary in order for the RAH-66 to be capable of surviving on the battlefield in the face of current anti-aircraft threats; however, the Army had instead decided to re-direct the bulk of its funding for rotary development toward the renovation of its existing helicopter fleet of attack, utility, and reconnaissance aircraft. Specifically, the Army also had plans to reuse the funds allocated to the Comanche program to speed up development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which could also perform the scouting role intended for the vehicle. At the time of its termination, the Comanche program had reportedly spent US$6.9 billion. The contract termination fees involved were estimated to total US$450–680 million for the main program partners Sikorsky and Boeing.

Subsequently, the Army decided to pursue development of another battlefield scout helicopter under the Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter program; this resulted in another rotorcraft, designated as the Bell ARH-70, being selected and developed with the intention to replace the OH-58D in place of the Comanche. However, during October 2008, it was announced that the ARH-70 also met with cancellation, reportedly due to cost overruns on its development.

A multitude of reasons contributed to the ultimate cancellation of the RAH-66 program. According to aviation author James Williams, efforts to speed up the program via the elimination of risk-mitigation measures and the stream of continuous adjustments to account for annual budget cuts to the rotorcraft resulted in the formation of a negative cycle that functioned to greatly extend the rotorcraft’s development schedule. Over the course of the Comanche’s development, multiple government agencies had acted to cut the number of helicopters that were intended to be ordered; one particularly common basis for such curtailments was that the Cold War had ended and thus such quantities were unnecessary (a phenomenon known as the «Peace Dividend»). However, significant reductions in volume directly resulted in the rapid climbs in the projections of the Comanche’s unit cost; in turn, this stimulated and gave validity to critics of the program, such as the Army Acquisition Executive James Ambrose, who had prominently declared that the Army would not receive any aircraft «costing a dollar over $7.5 million».

As early as 1995, it is claimed by Williams that the Comanche had been facing complete cancellation as a choice between which defense development programs were to be scrapped. During mid-1999, the Comanche was subject to substantial governmental scrutiny; the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that it had «serious doubts» about the program and noted that the Comanche would «consume almost two thirds of the whole Aviation budget by Fiscal Year 2008». In addition, wartime experiences, such as from the Kosovo War, had led to some senior figures within the Army to place a greater emphasis on the use of unmanned platforms for conducting many of the same roles for which the Comanche was being developed to perform. By 2000, Williams postulates that the primary reason for retaining the program was out of concern for the state of the helicopter industry—Sikorsky’s production and employment figures were at their lowest for decades and the contract was considered critical.

Author Fred Brooks criticized the program’s requirement for the Comanche to be capable of ferrying itself across the Atlantic as an example of excessive requirements being present in a project’s design phase and of their costly repercussions. Williams observes that the Comanche’s weight requirements were unachievable, and claimed that this was due to poor management, in which no party was allegedly aware of or in control of the rotorcraft’s final weight; there were concerns that, when outfitted with actual equipment required for operations, the Comanche’s engines would be incapable of lifting the total weight of the helicopter. Additionally, it has been claimed that it proved difficult to convince the Army that the program suffered from serious troubles while key individuals failed to realize the existence of insurmountable technical problems. Prized elements of the program, such as certain software capabilities and its integration, failed to foster confidence with Army overseers; several capabilities were viewed as having been unproven and risky, while the anticipated consumption of up to 40 per cent of the aviation budget by the Comanche alone for a number of years was considered to be extreme. According to Williams, it was concluded that the Army’s aviation budget would be better spent on the delivery of less risky and more critical needs.

In a report published during 2008, the GAO recorded that an Army spokesperson had stated that «the program’s costs could no longer be justified». Author Cindy Williams stated of the Comanche: «The rationale for cutting Comanche… is twofold. First, the doctrinal niche that the Comanche occupies is unnecessary in the near term and probably not viable in the longer term. Secondly, as with all rotary-wing aircraft, the Comanche is a voracious consumer of strategic airlift.»

The manufacturing team, Sikorsky and Boeing, have attributed factors that were outside of their control, such as budget cuts, «requirement creep,» and a protracted development period, to have caused problems with the program, rather than dysfunctionality on their part. Under the Comanche program, each company was responsible for the construction of different elements of the rotorcraft. Since the termination, both companies have decided to team up again to produce a jointly-developed prototype, designated as the SB-1 Defiant, for the Army’s Future Vertical Lift (FVL) programme.

Блок: 2/9 | Кол-во символов: 11015
Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing%E2%80%93Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

Конструкция и характеристики

Фюзеляж «Команча» собирался из композитных панелей, а главным несущим элементом была балка коробчатой формы, тоже композитная. Плоские поверхности панелей и радиопогощающее покрытие повышали незаметность вертолёта. Уровень производимого «Команчем» шума снижался за счёт пятилопастного винта (тоже композитного) и хвостового винта типа «фенестрон». Шасси, конечно, выполнили убирающимся.

Кабина RAH-66 двухместная, причем, если традиционно на переднем сиденье размещался оператор вооружения – теперь там усадили пилота.

Основным элементом каждой приборной доски были два многофункциональных дисплея, кроме того, информация отображалась на нашлемных дисплеях. Система управления вертолётом – электродистанционная.

RAH-66-Komanch конструкция

Новых комплексов вооружения для «Команча» не разрабатывалось, и по этому параметру он не отличался от других американских вертолётов. В закрывающихся отсеках RAH-66 мог нести противотанковые ракеты «Хеллфайр», НУР “Гидра» либо ракеты «Стингер» для защиты от воздушных целей.

Дополнительные ракеты могли подвешиваться на быстросъёмных пилонах.

А вот автоматическая пушка калибра 20мм несколько отличалась от существующих. В основе это было применённое на «Кобре» орудие М197, но для «Команча» его сильно облегчили, а гильзы патронов заменили алюминиевыми.

Команч в горах

Хотя прямого аналога «Команч» не имел, напрашивается его сравнение со знаменитой «Чёрной акулой». Хотя Ка-50 создавался, в первую очередь, как штурмовик, вертолёты схожи по высокотехнологичности, срокам разработки и известности в медиа.

 RAH-66 «Команч»Ка-50
Максимальный взлётный вес, кг 7,900 10,800
Максимальная скорость, км/ч 324 315
Боевой радиус, км 278 470
Потолок, м 4,566 5,500

Конечно, Ка-50 был сильнее вооружён и лучше бронирован. «Команч» выигрывал в незаметности и маневренности. Но судьба «Чёрной акулы» оказалась удачнее – она проложила дорогу двухместным модификациям.

Вертолёт Команч

Хотя «Команч» так и не вышел из стадии разработки, а серьёзным инструментом пропаганды не являлся – он успел приобрести массовую известность. Дело в том, что ещё до первых полётов RAH-66 фирма Nova Logic выпустила компьютерную игру, в которой игроку предлагалось полетать именно на «Команче».

На протяжении десятилетия вышло четыре поколения игры и ещё до выхода последней части продажи превысили два миллиона копий.

Когда в продажу пошла заключительная игра, вертолёт всё ещё считался перспективным и готовящимся к серийному производству…

Блок: 3/4 | Кол-во символов: 2417
Источник: https://WarBook.club/voennaya-tehnika/vertolety/komanch/

Design

RAH-66 prototype in 1997.

The Comanche was intended to be an advanced armed reconnaissance and attack helicopter. The Comanche was specifically tailored to the role of armed scout to replace the U.S. Army’s OH-58D Kiowa Warrior, which is an upgraded version of a Vietnam War-era observation helicopter. It was both smaller and lighter than the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter that it had been intended to accompany. The RAH-66 was powered by a pair of LHTEC T800 turboshaft engines, each capable of generating up to 1,563 hp (1,165 kW) of power. The RAH-66’s fuselage was 43 feet (13 m) long and composed of composite materials; it was designed to be capable of fitting more readily onto transport ships, enabling the Comanche to be more rapidly deployed to flash points and other rapidly-developing situations. However, in the event of strategic transport assets not being available, the helicopter’s ferry range of 1,200 nmi (2,200 km) would have allowed it to fly itself to battlefields overseas on its own.

As intended, it would have functioned as a stealth helicopter, incorporating a number of different techniques and technologies in order to reduce its radar cross-section (RCS) along with other areas of visibility and detectability. The exterior surfaces of the RAH-66 were faceted and covered with both radar-absorbent material (RAM) coatings and infrared-suppressant paint; as a result of these combined measures, the Comanche’s RCS was stated to be 360 times smaller than that of the AH-64 Apache. The acoustic signature of the helicopter was also reported to be noticeably lower than comparative helicopters; this reduction had been partially achieved through the adoption of an all-composite five-blade main rotor and pioneering canted tail rotor assembly.

As intended, the Comanche was to be equipped with sophisticated avionics, including navigation and detection systems, which would have enabled operations at night and in inclement weather. Its primary mission was scouting using its advanced sensors, in particular locating and designating targets for attack helicopters, such as the AH-64 Apache, to strike. The Comanche was furnished with a digital fly-by-wire flight control system. Each of the two crew members were to be provided with a pair of LCD multi-functional displays in addition to the Helmet-Integrated Display and Sight System (HIDSS).

For the light attack role, the RAH-66 was to be furnished with various armaments. It was equipped with a single chin-mounted 20 mm three-barrel XM301 rotary cannon, which could be pointed rearwards and retracted under a faring when not in use to decrease the helicopter’s radar cross-section. In addition, the RAH-66 was capable of internally carrying a maximum of six AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles or up to twelve AIM-92 Stinger air-to-air missiles, which would be evenly divided between a pair of retractable weapons pylons. Beyond storing munitions internally, the Comanche could also mount external stub wings to carry up to eight Hellfire missiles or sixteen Stinger missiles. However, operations performing with armaments mounted externally would reduce of the effectiveness of the Comanche’s stealth technologies.

Блок: 3/9 | Кол-во символов: 3208
Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing%E2%80%93Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

Тактико-технические характеристики

RAH-66 Comanche (спереди) и AH-64 Apache

Источник данных: Jane’s

Технические характеристики

  • Экипаж: 2 человека (пилот и оператор)
  • Длина: 14,28 м
  • Длина фюзеляжа: 13,2 м (без пушки)
  • Диаметр несущего винта: 12,9 м
  • Диаметр фенестрона: 1,37 м
  • Максимальная ширина фюзеляжа: 2,04 м
  • Высота: 3,37 м (до несущего винта)
  • Площадь, ометаемая несущим винтом: 116,74 м²
  • Масса пустого: 4 218 кг
  • Нормальная взлётная масса: 5 601 кг (с 4×Hellfire и 2×Stinger)
  • Максимальная взлётная масса: 7 896 кг
  • Масса полезной нагрузки: 2 296 кг
  • Масса топлива во внутренних баках: 870 кг
  • Объём топливных баков: 1 142 л (только внутренний)
  • Силовая установка: 2 × турбовальных LHTEC T800-LHT-801
  • Мощность двигателей: 2 × 1 563 л.с. (2 × 1 165 кВт)

Лётные характеристики

  • Максимальная скорость: 324 км/ч
  • Крейсерская скорость: 306 км/ч
  • Боевой радиус: 278 км
  • Перегоночная дальность: 2 222 км
  • Продолжительность полёта: 2 ч. 30 мин.
  • Скороподъёмность: 4,5 м/с
  • Нагрузка на диск: 71 кг/м² (максимальная)
  • Тяговооружённость: 207 Вт/кг (на трансмиссию) 
  • Максимальная эксплуатационная перегрузка: +3,5/-1 g

Вооружение

Блок: 4/9 | Кол-во символов: 1105
Источник: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_/_Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

Видео

Блок: 4/4 | Кол-во символов: 9
Источник: https://WarBook.club/voennaya-tehnika/vertolety/komanch/

Aircraft on display

Both prototype airframes 94-0327, 95-0001, are located at the United States Army Aviation Museum at Fort Rucker, Alabama.

Блок: 4/9 | Кол-во символов: 142
Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing%E2%80%93Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

В культуре

RAH-66 Comanche стал героем многих кинофильмов и компьютерных игр. В том числе:

  • Enemy Engaged: Comanche vs Hokum (В России известная как «Разорванное небо Ка-52 против Команча»)
  • х/ф Халк
  • Вертолёт-охотник из компьютерной игры Half-Life 2 очень похож на RAH-66. Возможно, что его рисовали именно с «Команча».
  • ArmA 3 — под обозначением AH-99 Blackfoot.
  • 9 игр из серии Comanche, посвященных исключительно RAH-66.
  • Command & Conquer: Generals — Zero Hour — появляется в игре за кампанию США.
  • Strike (серия игр) — в качестве основного вертолёта в игре Jungle Strike использовался вертолёт RAH-66 Comanche.
  • В компьютерной игре LHX (наряду с AH-64 Apache, UH-60 BlackHawk и V-22 Osprey).
  • В симуляторе Gunship 2000 под наименованием AH-66
  • В симуляторе «Ударная сила»/»Fair Strike» (2003 г.)
  • В игре Counter Strike Online в одном из игровых режимов является боссом.
  • В игре Act Of War у стороны Task Force Talon.
  • Является финальным боссом в игре «The Underground Man».

Блок: 5/9 | Кол-во символов: 971
Источник: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_/_Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

Кол-во блоков: 17 | Общее кол-во символов: 20814
Количество использованных доноров: 3
Информация по каждому донору:

  1. https://WarBook.club/voennaya-tehnika/vertolety/komanch/: использовано 3 блоков из 4, кол-во символов 4072 (20%)
  2. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_/_Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche: использовано 3 блоков из 9, кол-во символов 2377 (11%)
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing%E2%80%93Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche: использовано 3 блоков из 9, кол-во символов 14365 (69%)


Поделитесь в соц.сетях:

Оцените статью:

1 Звезда2 Звезды3 Звезды4 Звезды5 Звезд (Пока оценок нет)
Загрузка...

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован.